Meniscal Extrusion in the Knee: Should only 3 mm Extrusion be Considered Significant? An Assessment by MRI and Arthroscopy

AIM The aim of this study was to assess whether significant meniscal extrusion of more than 3 mm or of even lesser degrees of extrusion could be considered significant. We also aimed to determine the morphology of tears that are most likely to be associated with significant extrusion. Study design and material. The study was done retrospectively on a group of 202 patients (157 males and 45 females) who had been seen in our hospital between 2007 and 2011 with meniscal tears (in one knee only) diagnosed by MRI and confirmed on arthroscopy. Extrusion of 3 mm or more (usually considered significant) was seen in 102 cases and less than 3 mm in 100. Extrusion was measured on the coronal MR images rather than on saggital images because of ease and reproducibility. The tears were confirmed by arthroscopy and correlated with the extent of extrusion on MRI. RESULTS Out of the total of 202 cases, 102 cases (50.5%) had extrusion of 3 mm or more on MRI. Of these, the medial meniscal posterior horn tears accounted for 63 cases (64.26%), 21 cases were medial meniscal body tears (21.42%), five medial meniscal root tears (5.1%), nine lateral meniscal body tears (9.18%) and four lateral meniscal posterior horn tears(4.08%). Forty-four cases had extrusion of 3-4 mm, 26 had extrusion of 4-5mm, 17 cases had extrusion of 5-6mm, ten had extrusion of 6-7mm and five had extrusion of 7 mm or more. One hundred cases fell in the < 3mm extrusion category, of which 80 (39.6%) were in the 2-3 mm extrusion group and 20 (9.9%) in the 1-2 mm extrusion group. They comprised of 61 cases of medial meniscal posterior horn tears, 23 cases of medial meniscal body tears, six medial meniscal root tears, eight lateral meniscal body tears and two lateral meniscal posterior horn tears. The highest proportion of meniscal tears was seen in the 2-3 mm category comprising nearly 40% of the entire study group. The majority of tears were medial meniscal posterior horn tears. CONCLUSION Menisci that extruded 2-3 mm from the tibial margin formed a major proportion of menisci treated for tears by repair or menisectomy. We should consider extrusion of more than 2mm as significant. Most tears had extrusion of 2-4 mm.